I think this Alaskan hockey mom who gives feminists extreme headaches exactly nailed the difference between conservative and liberal thinking in her statement, " We eat therefore we hunt."
The liberal approach to this subject would be, " We eat therefore we expect the goverment to hunt and deliver a fair share of meat/tofu to our door."
To have economic and social sound politics, however, we all need to be committed to hunt which means we need to keep the incentive to hunt so that we can then share with those who can't catch anything and would starve otherwise such as children and elderly. If we all stop hunting it won't work. If we all stop sharing, it won't work either. If we exploit the hunters to a point where it is not desirable to hunt anymore or if we destroy the hunting environment, we will jeopardize our existence.
So easy is that - balanced cavemen politics that does not require ivy league membership, just common sense.












Recent Comments